Justice Borden on Constitutional Interpretation and the First Amendment

Former state Supreme Court justice David Borden penned an excellent commentary in the Hartford Courant this weekend.  The subject: the very serious problems with “originalism” as a mode of constitutional interpretation.  As Justice Borden points out, if the First Amendment is interpreted as it was “understood” at the time it was adopted, folks like Rush Limbaugh and Rachel Maddow  could be punished for much of what they say, which is often critical of the government and, more particularly, the men and women who govern.  This is a “must read” for lawyers and members of the general public by one of the state’s most respected and thoughtful jurists.


One Comment on “Justice Borden on Constitutional Interpretation and the First Amendment”

  1. Joe says:

    This is indeed a great commentary by Justice Borden. The First Amendment is under perpetual attack and fire in this day and age. Good for him for standing up for it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s