The King v. Burwell Sham

It is June folks!  That means the U.S. Supreme Court will soon issue decisions in some of the most consequential, and controversial, cases of the term.  I’m especially antsy as I await the decision in King v. Burwell, about which I have written before.  This otherwise run-of-the-mill statutory construction case has the potential to destroy the Affordable Care Act by depriving millions of people who purchase insurance through Healthcare.gov–the federally operated exchange–of access to the same subsidies available to people who purchase insurance through state-operated exchanges.

Read the rest of this entry »


Arrest Records Transparency Bill Passes Senate

Shortly after 1:00 a.m. this morning, the Senate gave final approval to a bill that substantially restores much of the public access to arrest records that was lost last year when the state Supreme Court issued a decision that held that the public was only entitled to minimal access to arrest records while a law enforcement action or prosecution was pending.  The bill, which passed the House unanimously last week, now goes to Governor Malloy for his signature.  (Read Jon Lender’s story in the Hartford Courant about the bill.)

Read the rest of this entry »


Cato Institute To Hold Conference On Kelo Case; Horton To Speak.

On Thursday, June 11, the Cato Institute, a conservative think tank, will hold a conference on the legacy of the United States Supreme Court’s now ten year old, famous (infamous? notorious?) decision in Kelo v. City of New London, described by some as the “most controversial modern property rights decision” in the history of the court.  Wes Horton, who represented the city, will speak, as will Scott Bullock of the Institute for Justice, which represented the petitioner.  Other distinguished panelists will also present their thoughts on the decision.

Looks like a great conference. Go Wes!


A More Diverse State Judiciary

Mark Pazniokas, over at The CT Mirror, has this interesting article today on Governor Malloy’s successful efforts to increase the diversity of the state judiciary.  Paz writes, “Thirty percent of the 47 judges Malloy has nominated to the Superior Court since taking office in 2011 have been minorities, twice the percentage of those named by his immediate predecessors, Rell and Rowland. . . .  Of his 47 nominees for the trial bench, Malloy has picked 14 minorities: two Asians, nine African-Americans and three Hispanics. Nineteen, or 40 percent, have been women, who now comprise 35 percent of the trial bench.”


Klau To Share Society of Professional Journalists’ 2015 Helen M. Loy Award

I am deeply honored to share this prestigious open government award with four fantastic journalists, editors and publishers at the Connecticut Law Tribune: Tom Scheffey, Paul Sussman, Jeff Forte and Isaac Avilucea.  One could not ask for better clients or a better cause worth fighting for.

UPDATE: A friend suggested I link to a song I wrote a few years back about freedom of information.  It’s worth a chuckle or two, especially late at night, after a few drinks. . . .


How Did Lapointe Know Bernice Martin Was Raped?

As the State of Connecticut considers whether to retry Richard Lapointe, and as many of his supporters try to persuade the state not to do so, I offer readers this short, yet significant, excerpt from the Connecticut Supreme Court’s 1996 decision rejecting his direct appeal from his conviction for murdering Bernice Martin, his wife’s eighty-eight year old grandmother:

Read the rest of this entry »


Supreme Court Denies Motion For Reconsideration In Lapointe Case

In a previous post I discussed the State of Connecticut’s motion asking the Connecticut Supreme Court to reconsider its controversial decision in Lapointe v. Comm’r of Correction.  I have just learned that, by order dated May 5, 2015, the Supreme Court denied that motion.  The two justices who dissented from the original decision–Zarella and Espinosa–would have granted the motion for reconsideration.  In short, the votes on the motion tracked the votes on the original decision.

Read the rest of this entry »


Second Circuit Strikes Down NSA Bulk Telephony Metadata Collection Program

Ruthann Robson has this excellent post on the Constitutional Law Prof Blog on yesterday’s very important decision by the Second Circuit, which held that the NSA lacks the statutory authority under section 215 of the PATRIOT Act to collect millions and millions of call records from commercial providers, like Verizon.  Edward Snowden revealed the existence of this program.


Legal (Sort Of) Quote Of The Day

“There is not a crime, there is not a dodge, there is not a trick, there is not a swindle, there is not a vice, that does not live by secrecy.”

–Joseph Pulitzer


The Spending Cap, Ctd

The Yankee Institute for Public Policy, a Connecticut-based conservative think tank, recently released a policy brief concerning Connecticut’s spending cap.  The brief is referenced in an Op-Ed on CT News Junkie authored by Peter Bowman, President of the Connecticut Lawyer’s Chapter of the Federalist Society.

Contrary to my earlier post, which explains why the spending cap is judicial unenforceable, the Executive Summary of the policy brief states that “if lawmakers raise taxes while also exceeding the spending cap without an emergency declaration, taxpayers may have cause to challenge their tax bills in court.”  The key word in this sentence is “may,” and it is a word with which I respectfully disagree, unless it is construed to mean “infinitesimally small possibility.”

Read the rest of this entry »