Talking About Prior Restraints On “The Wheelhouse”

WNPR’s John Dankosky invited me to join him yesterday for a segment of his weekly political roundtable, The Wheelhouse, with Colin McEnroe and other guests.  The subject: a Superior Court judge’s issuance of an injunction against the Connecticut Law Tribune to bar it from publishing a story about a child protection case in Juvenile Court.  (Disclosure: I represent the Law Trib in the case.)

Click here to listen to the show.  (My segment starts at 19:48 into the program.)

Thanks for having me on The Wheelhouse for two consecutive weeks John!

 


There’s A New Legal Blog In Town. . . .

Fellow appellate advocate Dan Krisch has just joined the legal blogosphere with his new blog, Holding Court.  Dan describes his new blog this way:

Life moves so quickly nowadays that we often fail to observe and analyze what is important. Most of all, we fail to think, to reason, to question and to discuss as the world whirls by us.  This blog is my contribution to remedying that lack — my thoughts on (mostly) legal issues and trends … with the occasional seasoning of references to music, art and pop culture as the spirit moves me.

Dan’s most recent post, “Transparency, Privacy and Prior Restraint,” concerns a small case with which I have some familiarity, one involving a Superior Court judge’s recent decision to grant an injunction–a “prior restraint”–against the Connecticut Law Tribune publishing a story about a child protection matter.

Dan loves the law, knows the law and loves to write about the law.  I look forward to more posts.  Welcome to the blogosphere Dan!


Yes, I Am Ari Klau’s Father, Ctd.

My apologies for another divergence from the usual subject of this blog to give another shout out to my son, Ari Klau, a senior at William Hall High School in West Hartford, CT, who placed third yesterday in the 2014 Foot Locker Northeast Regionals at Van Cortland Park in New York!!!  Ari completed the 5000m course in 15:36.  His third place finish (out of 158 runners) earned him a trip to San Diego in two weeks, where the top 40 high school cross country runners from around the country will compete in the Foot Locker National Cross Country Championships.

Ari Klau Post-Race Interview


Discussing The Ferguson Grand Jury, Sen. Maynard And More On The Wheelhouse

Last Wednesday was a pre-Thanksgiving treat: WNPR’s John Dankosky invited me to join him, Colin McEnroe and several other guests on his regular Wednesday morning show, The Wheelhouse.  We discussed the Ferguson grand jury decision, retiring Senate President Don William’s new gig at the CEA, the Office of the Child Advocate’s report on Adam Lanza, and oh so much more.  I had a great time John and Colin.  Thanks for inviting me on the show!

CT-N taped the show.  If you like to watch people sit in a radio studio and talk to each other, click here.

 


Senator Maynard And The Oath

Questions abound about what will happen if State Senator Andrew Maynard, who suffered serious injuries during a fall last August but was nonetheless reelected earlier this month, cannot take the oath of office when the General Assembly convenes in January.  This post explores some of the legal issues surrounding those questions.  The post is by no means definitive.  It is the beginning of my legal exploration of the issue, not the end.  I welcome comments.

Read the rest of this entry »


Appellate Court To Hear Jane Doe Case

The Connecticut Appellate Court will hear oral arguments this Thursday morning in the case of In re: Angel R., otherwise known as the Jane Doe case.  Jane is a transgender youth in the custody of the Department of Children and Families, whose temporary transfer to the York Correctional Institution For Women in Niantic earlier this year provoked strong reactions from many individuals and civil rights groups.  The appeal focuses on the constitutionality of a rarely invoked statute that authorizes a Superior Court judge, under certain circumstances, to transfer a youth in DCF custody to a correctional facility.  Two of the briefs in the case are available at this link.


NTSB Rules That Drones Are “Aircraft”

Flying a drone over the University of Virginia for the purpose of taking commercial photographs of the university may cost the drone operator $10,000 for violating the Federal Aviation Administration’s prohibition against flying “aircraft” in a reckless or careless manner.  (Allegedly the drone operator scared the bejesus out of someone by flying the drone “directly towards an individual standing on a . . . sidewalk causing the individual to take immediate evasive maneuvers so as to avoid being struck by [the] aircraft”; “through a . . . tunnel containing moving vehicles”; “under a crane”; “below tree top level over a tree lined walkway”; “under an elevated pedestrian walkway”; and “within approximately 100 feet of an active heliport.”) 

Read the rest of this entry »


Rep. Cafero And The Judicial Selection Commission

Attorney and Hartford Courant columnist Kevin Rennie reports on his blog, Daily Ructions, that outgoing House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero will soon appear before the Judicial Selection Commission (JSC), which is required by law to evaluate any person seeking appointment as a Superior Court judge.  Only persons receiving the JSC’s stamp of approval may be nominated to the bench.  Rennie questions whether Cafero is fit for approval as a judge.  The members of the JSC will have to decide that issue for themselves based on the relevant criteria (see below).

Read the rest of this entry »


The Practice Book And Section 1-2z–Not!

This post is another in a series of Dan Klau mini-tirades against the judicial application of General Statutes § 1-2z–the statutory “plain meaning rule”–to legal texts that are not statutes.  As I have said before, and now say once again, the plain language of § 1-2z makes clear that it only applies to statutes.  Thus, it does not apply to administrative regulations, local ordinances or, in my opinion, the Practice Book.  Yet the state Supreme Court appears to disagree.

Read the rest of this entry »


Lawsuit Filed To Extend Polling Hours In Hartford

In response to problems in certain Hartford polling precincts, where voter registration lists were not available when the polls opened at 6:00 a.m., Governor Malloy has filed a lawsuit asking a Superior Court judge to extend the polling hours by one hour, i.e., from 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.  Here is the link to the just-filed complaint.  The complaint relies upon a 2008 Attorney General opinion, which states that a judge has the legal authority to extend voting hours under “exceptional circumstances.”  The question, then, is whether a judge will view the particular circumstances described above as extraordinary.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 373 other followers